Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Consolidated Boat Store Co.

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided January 31, 1898Published

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLISTER, J.,

Jackson and Smith, JJ., concurring.

The original action was brought to recover unpaid subscriptions to the capital stock of The O’Neal <fc Price Company,a corporation of Ohio, and to assess stockholders under the double liability provisions of our constitution and laws. A referee was appoirted who found, among other things, that Thomas P. Egan was a subscriber for 100 shares of the capital stock, and had, in good faith, by the transfer of certain property to the corporation, paid for his stock in full.

This finding was affirmed at Special Term, and W. E. Robertson, the plaintifi…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morehead v. AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Miller v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API