Legal Opinion

Elliot v. Luengene

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 15, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiffs,- entered upon a verdict, and from order denying motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCarthy, J.

The principal issue between the parties herein was whether the goods claimed were sold or -consigned to the defendant. The evidence was conflicting, and the jury under a fair and impartial charge having found against the defendant and in favor of the plaintiffs- settles the question so far as we are concerned.

*19We are then to consider the question of irregularity raised and the exceptions taken at the trial. We, of course, can only pass on the record before us and do not think there is sufficient to urge us in the matter of the irregularity claimed and particularly under the statement of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gildersleeve v. . LandonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Elliott v. LuengeneCity of New York Municipal Court · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Levey v. DennettCity of New York Municipal Court · 1898
  2. Ruben v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API