Legal Opinion
United States v. Gonzalez
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 13, 1999No. 96-5303PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUBINA, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Rodrigo Buitrago (“Buitra-go”), Juan Jose Diaz (“Diaz”), Francisco Gonzalez (“Gonzalez”), David Santiago (“Santiago”), and Carmello Claudio (“Claudio”), appeal their convictions and sentences for several offenses relating to a cocaine conspiracy. Buitrago and Diaz were convicted of Count I, charging conspiracy to import cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 963. All defendants were convicted of Count II, charging them with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and Count III, charging them with using or…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Henness v. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Darnita McGhee v. Joan Yukins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Robert J. Van Hook v. Carl S. Anderson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Jean-Marie Rosemond DulcioCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.