Legal Opinion

Dunbar v. Dunbar

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1994No. 1992-1947PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 68 Ohio St.3d 369.] DUNBAR, APPELLEE, v. DUNBAR, N.K.A. GREBLER, APPELLANT. [Cite as Dunbar v. Dunbar,

1994-Ohio-509.] Domestic relations—Arrearages in child support which have not been reduced to a lump-sum judgment are not subject to interest provisions of R.C. 1343.03. Arrearages in child support which have not been reduced to a lump-sum judgment are not subject to the interest provisions of R.C. 1343.03. (No. 92-1947—Submitted December 7, 1993—Decided March 2, 1994.) Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Butler County, No.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Booth v. BoothOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Cox v. Oliver MacHinery Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Rand v. RandOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Dunbar v. DunbarOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Forest Hills Local School v. Huegel, Ca2007-02-026 (5-19-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Hickman v. Hickman, 2008ap110072 (5-12-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API