Legal Opinion
Patti Cahoo v. SAS Analytics Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 3, 2019No. 18-1295/1296PublishedCited by 145 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
*892 Julie McMurtry, Steven Geskey, Shemin Blundell, Dorris Mitchell, Debra Singleton, and Sharon Moffet-Massey (together the "Individual Agency Defendants") appeal the district court's decision denying their Motion to Dismiss ("Motion") based on qualified immunity, in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the Individual Agency Defendants implemented and oversaw an automated computer system that falsely determined that Plaintiffs had committed unemployment insurance fraud and deprived Plaintiffs of protected property interests as a result of those erroneous fraud…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by145 opinions
- Kevin Lipman v. Armond BudishCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Jennifer Garza v. Lansing Sch. DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Derek Waskul v. Washtenaw Cnty. Community Mental HealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Henry Kaplan v. Univ. of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Golf Village N., LLC v. City of Powell, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.