Legal Opinion

Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills v. Eudaly

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 17, 1957No. 36647PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.

For the sake of convenience we shall refer to the Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills as the defendant, and Mrs. Audrey D. Eudaly as the plaintiff. Stafford Benedict, the co-defendant, will be referred to by name.

The defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was predicated on the theory that the evidence did not prove the plaintiff’s case as laid; that the evidence demanded a finding that at the time of the collision made the basis of the case, Stafford Benedict was not acting for Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills, but was engaged upon a mission which was purely personal to him; and that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Reddy-Waldhauer-Maffett Co. v. SpiveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Atlanta Furniture Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Fambro v. SparksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  5. Selman v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Price v. Star Service & Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Ditmyer v. American Liberty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Chappell v. Junior Achievement of Greater Atlanta, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Grant v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Harper v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API