Commonwealth v. Owens
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Per Curiam,
The six judges who heard this appeal being equally divided, the order is affirmed.
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
In Support of Reversal :
Appellant contends that it was error for the lower court to dismiss Ms PCHA petition without a hearing or without leave to amend for “extraordinary circumstances.”
On May 12,1966, appellant was convicted on charges of armed robbery, assault and battery, larceny and two counts of receiving stolen goods. Appellant filed a Post Conviction Hearing petition on December 7, 1966. After a hearing, at which counsel was present, the hearing judge denied…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Commonwealth v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. CordellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. OwensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. OwensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975