Legal Opinion

In the Interest of S. R. B.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 10, 1993No. A93A2489PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

S. R. B. was adjudicated delinquent because he committed an act which, if it had been committed by an adult, would constitute rape. He appeals, asserting the evidence was not sufficient to support the juvenile court’s determination that S. R. B. was delinquent. Specifically, S. R. B. asserts that the evidence did not demonstrate that the victim was raped and that, even if it did, the evidence did not demonstrate that he participated in the crime. Held:

The victim testified that one Michael Banks forcibly placed his penis in her vagina against her will for a few…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. In the Interest of J. T. M.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. Perry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Ceaser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. Hines v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. In the Interest of J. W. L.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. In Re JWLCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API