Legal Opinion

Kirshenbaum v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1922No. 21707PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: Charles Leslie, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtMorrissey, C. J.

Plaintiffs brought suit against defendant on a policy of burglary insurance. At the conclusion of the evidence, on motion of defendant, the jury were dismissed and the court entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiffs appeal. The general clause of the contract insures against loss in the following terms:

“A. Eor all loss by burglary of merchandise, described in the schedule hereof, and furniture and fixtures from within the premises as hereinafter defined, occasioned by any person or persons who shall have made felonious entry into the premises by actual force and violence when the premises are…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boon v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. Salem Mfg. Co. v. First American Fire Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  3. Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  4. Segebart Ex Rel. Segebart v. GregoryNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Pape v. Home Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API