Legal Opinion
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Stoker
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
Decided February 23, 1984No. 11-83-256-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RALEIGH BROWN, Justice.
This is an appeal from the granting of a temporary injunction. Richard Lee Stoker, Rhylene Stoker, Lester 0. Moore and Martha E. Moore sought an injunction against Chevron U.S.A. Inc., to restrain Chevron from discontinuing delivery of free gas. Chevron is the operator of the SACROC Unit, a unitized oil field in Scurry County. Appellees are lessors or successors in interest to lessors under two of the oil and gas leases unitized as part of the SACROC Unit.
Gas produced from the SACROC Unit is processed to remove dangerous quantities of carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Texas Foundaries, Inc. v. International Molders & Foundry Workers UnionTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
- Camp v. ShannonTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Brooks v. Expo Chemical Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Canteen Corp. v. Republic of Texas Properties, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Cytogenix, Inc. v. Waldroff, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- Ford Motor Co. v. Butnaru, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
- Cytogenix, Inc. v. William B. Waldroff and Applied Veterinary Genomics, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.