Legal Opinion

Vann v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 13, 1985No. CA CR 84-162PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawson Cloninger, Judge.

In this criminal case, appellant argues that the trial court erred in refusing to grant a continuance and that there was insufficient evidence upon which to base a conviction for aggravated assault. We find his arguments unpersuasive and accordingly affirm.

Appellant was charged with the offense of aggravated assault under Ark., Stat. Ann. § 41-1604 (Repl. 1977) following an incident that occurred in August, 1983. From testimony at trial, it appears that appellant and Wayne Jordan had known each other for some time and there was evidence that the two had had a problem…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lunon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Kelley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. Pickens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Tippitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Neely v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Lagrone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API