Legal Opinion

Wallner v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1948PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The appellant was placed under arrest under the circumstances set forth in the above statement of facts. It may be understood that those responsible for the arrest were not acting in any other manner or prompted by any other motive, than to perform their duties as sheriff and police officials.

The obligation of an official is twofold, to apprehend the person named in the warrant and to avoid interfering with one not involved. The rule is that where an authority given by law is exceeded, the officer loses the benefit of his justification, and the law holds him a trespasser ab initio although to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. FanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Filer v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Keesling v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. State v. DettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Bean v. BestSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State v. GumsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Robinson v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API