Legal Opinion

City of Elkhart v. Wickwire

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 10,106PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

It is true, as counsel for appellant contends, that a plaintiff may state his cause of action in different forms *79in order to prevent a possible failure of proof. Snyder v. Snyder, 25 Ind. 399; Stearns v. Dubois, 55 Ind. 257. It does not follow, however, that it is error to sustain a demurrer to one of two paragraphs, where both plead the same cause of action, and where the plaintiff is entitled to give the same evidence under one paragraph that he would be entitled to do if both were left standing. In this case the first and second, paragraphs of the complaint are substantially the same, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jansen v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  2. Ex parte WallsIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. McNaughton v. City of ElkhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Spraker v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Stearns v. DuboisIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Anderson v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Vinton v. BaldwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Hormann v. HartmetzIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Kinloch Telephone Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  5. Washington Hotel Realty Co. v. Bedford Stone & Construction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1924

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API