Legal Opinion

In re: Anna Stahl

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 7, 2021No. CC-20-1254-SGFUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

FILED APR 7 2021 NOT FOR PUBLICATION SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: BAP No. CC-20-1254-SGF ANNA STAHL, Debtor. Bk. No. 2:20-bk-11739-WB EMCYTE CORP., Appellant, v. MEMORANDUM1 ANNA STAHL, Appellee. Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California Julia Wagner Brand, Bankruptcy Judge, Presiding Before: SPRAKER, GAN, and FARIS, Bankruptcy Judges. INTRODUCTION Appellant EmCyte Corp. appeals the bankruptcy court’s order confirming debtor Anna Stahl’s chapter…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. TrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. Edriver Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Atwood v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Co. (In Re Atwood)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. In the Matter of Timothy R. Pearson and Mary T. Pearson, Debtors. Comprehensive Accounting Corporation v. Timothy R. Pearson and Mary T. PearsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API