Legal Opinion

Tristar Petroleum, Inc. v. RAD Energy Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 5, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), entered July 9, 2001, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied their cross motion for summary judgment on their first and second causes of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

“The construction and interpretation of an unambiguous written contract is an issue of law within the province of the court” (Katina, Inc. v Famiglietti, 306 AD2d 440, 441 [2003]; see RAD…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. RAD Ventures Corp. v. ArtukmacAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Katina, Inc. v. FamigliettiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. RAD Ventures Corp. v. ArtukmacAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In re the Estate of PageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API