Legal Opinion

Matheson v. Kinnear

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 28, 1975No. 187-73C3PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before KILKENNY, Circuit Judge, and EAST and TURRENTINE, District Judges. TURRENTINE, District Judge:

Jurisdiction

This three judge court, convened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2281, has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331(a), 2201 and 1343; 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and the Treaties of Medicine Creek, 10 Stat. 1132 (1854) and with the Quinault Indians, 12 Stat. 971 (1855). The matters in controversy exceed the sum or value of $10,000.

Status of Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Edward Comenout is a non-competent Quinault Indian, enrolled with the Quinault Tribe of Indians, pursuant to 25…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Comenout v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Comenout v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Opinion No. Oag 24-82, (1982), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API