Legal Opinion

State v. Pugh

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 27, 2012No. 2012AP481-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.

¶ 1. Melvin Pugh appeals the judgment entered on his guilty plea to unlawfully possessing a firearm as a convicted felon. See Wis. Stat. § 941.29(2)(a). The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the circuit court properly denied Pugh's motion to suppress evidence of the gun he was carrying when the police stopped and seized him.1 On our de novo review of the legal issue of whether the police lawfully seized Pugh, we conclude that they did not, and, accordingly, reverse.

I

¶ 2. The only person testifying at the suppression hearing was one of the arresting officers, Timothy Keller, who had been…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MurraySupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
  2. State v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
  3. State v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. State v. Avan Rondell NimmerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. Avan Rondell NimmerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API