Legal Opinion

In Re Redevelopment Auth. of Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 2007No. 36 EAP 2006PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BALDWIN.

The primary question raised in this appeal is whether taking private property, certified as blighted 36 years previously, by eminent domain, in order to convey the property to a religious entity as part of a redevelopment plan, violates the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution. The Commonwealth Court, in a four-three en banc decision, reversed the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia’s determination that the taking was lawful, and found that, among other things, the taking violated the Establishment Clause. Because we believe that under the limited…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Everson v. Board of Ed. of EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mazur v. Trinity Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Governor's Office v. Office of Open Records, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. In re Condemnation of Land for the South East Central Business District Redevelopment Area 1Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Pennsylvania Bankers Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Department of BankingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. In Re Condemnation of Land for the South East Central Business District Redevelopment Area 1Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API