Legal Opinion

Gavilanes v. Dilan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 19, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law article 14, the petitioners appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), dated September 8, 2000, as, sua sponte, imposed upon them $1,000 in costs, and imposed sanctions upon the petitioners Zuleika Gavilanes, Micdalia Rodriquez, Eleanor Sullivan, Christina Miro, and Robert Camacho for frivolous conduct, and B. Mitchell Alter appeals from so much of the same order as, sua sponte, imposed a sanction upon him for frivolous conduct.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the notice of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Karnes v. City of White PlainsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Bahamonde v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Musumeci v. MusumeciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Joan 2000, Ltd. v. Deco Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Hamilton v. CorderoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. G&L Industries, Inc./iOld Action Labs, Inc. v. Bell Bates Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Mimoun v. ZichermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. In re Estate of SwidowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API