Legal Opinion

Kingman, Pratt & Western Railroad v. Quinn

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 15, 1891PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from Pratt Distriot Court. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion, infra, filed at the session of the court in February, 1891.

1Per curiam

A reexamination of the record in this case satisfies us that the first alleged error was not sufficiently considered in the former hearing. The case was dismissed in this court upon the ground that the evidence was not all preserved in the record. It was stated in the opinion “ that the record should contain all of the evidence introduced during the trial of the case in the court below to intelligently con*478sider the questions raised by the plaintiff iu error.” The first alleged error was, “That the court erred in the admission of testimony tending to show that the justice of the peace, at the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Phillips v. ThrallsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. State ex rel. Lewis v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  3. McGonigle v. AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  4. Brookover v. EsterlySupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  5. Whittaker v. VoorheesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Van WagnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Summerlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Dowell v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Leforce v. HaymesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Rogers v. J. R. Oil & Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API