Legal Opinion
Fuhrman v. Comm'r
United States Tax Court
Decided September 29, 2011No. Docket No. 21786-08UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL E. AND MARILYN J. FUHRMAN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Fuhrman v. Comm'r
Docket No. 21786-08.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 2011-236; 2011 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 230; 102 T.C.M. (CCH) 347;
September 29, 2011, Filed
Decision will be entered for respondent.
Nicholas I. Andersen and Michael J. Zaino, for petitioners.
Edward Lee Walter, for respondent.
THORNTON, Judge.
THORNTON
MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION
THORNTON, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies of $27,917 and $25,534 in petitioners' 2004 and 2005 Federal income taxes, respectively, and section…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Commissioner v. HeiningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Hradesky v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
- Frank J. Hradesky v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Haskel Engineering & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aspro, Inc. v. CIRCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- Elick v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2013
- Little Mt. Corp. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2016