Legal Opinion
Concepcion v. United States Navy
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 2, 1983No. 81 Civ. 3515 (CBM)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTLEY, Chief Judge.
This is an action under the Jones Act. Pro se plaintiff Robert Concepcion (Concepcion) claims that, on October 2, 1979, he suffered personal injuries while serving as a merchant seaman aboard defendants’ ves'sel, the U.S.N.S. Potomac (the Potomac). Plaintiff seeks to recover lost earnings. The United States Navy (the Navy), owner of the Potomac, and Trinidad Corp., a private steamship company that operated the Potomac under contract with the Navy, are named as defendants.
This case is now before the court on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Usner v. Luckenbach Overseas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Petition of the United States of America and Mathiasen's Tanker Industries, Inc., for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability as Owners of the U.S.N.S. Mission San Francisco, United States of America, in No. 15294. Mathiasen's Tanker Industries, Inc., in No. 15281Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Remington Products, Inc. v. North American Philips Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
- Albany Sav. Bank, FSB v. HalpinDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1996
- Domantay v. United States Department of the NavyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1992