State v. Ockij

*2391' timumceY dui *238I. It is said the court erred in overruling defendant’s motion for a continuance. The motion was based *239upon the absence of one Gulic, who was desired by defendant as a witness. It appears there were six persons present at the time of the shooting, four besides the defendant and the prosecuting witness. Of these, the prosecuting witness and one other testified for the state, and the defendant for himself. Of the three others, defendant claims two were friendly to the state. Of these two, one had gone to New Mexico, and the whereabouts of the other was unknown. The other, Gulic,…