State v. Raiford

Plaintiff was convicted of receiving and concealing a stolen credit card, ORS 165.045, and appeals, alleging errors: (1) that a motion to suppress the credit card as evidence should have been allowed; (2) a, warrant for arrest of the defendant for larceny should not have been received in evidence; and (3) the verdict of 10 to 2 for conviction was unconstitutional. Less than unanimous verdicts were upheld in State v. Gann, 254 Or 549, 463 P2d 570 (1969).

The state produced testimony from police officers, part of which was disputed by the defendant’s testimony, from which the jury could have…