Legal Opinion

Gillespie v. Schomaker

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided January 12, 1961No. 955PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWINFORD, District Judge.

The record is before the court on the motion of the defendants, Robert L. Sidell and Madeline C. Sidell, to dismiss the action, and the motion of the defendants, Stanley W. Schomaker and Richard Busker, for a more definite statement. Memorandums have been filed in support of and in opposition to the motions. The defendants, Carl George Schomaker, Gaines Reed, Jr., Anthony Laboma, Claire C. Katsanis, and The Belmont, have filed their answer.

Before reaching the motions, the court examined the complaint and finds that there are more serious defects than have been raised…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. WillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Stern v. BeerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  4. Brooks v. YawkeyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
  5. Chicago Stadium Corporation, a Corporation v. The State of Indiana, as TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Berman v. Riverside Casino CorporationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1964
  2. Carroll v. General Medical Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1971
  3. Baker v. MurphyDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1980
  4. McMillon v. O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API