Lomin Corp. v. Kohlhepp

The defendant in this case moves to vacate a warrant of seizure issued by this court on the ground that the affidavits upon which same was obtained did not set forth sufficient facts to justify the court in dispensing with the five days’ notice required by the provisions of section 72 of the Municipal Court Code. The moving papers set forth other grounds, but these were withdrawn by stipulation of counsel.

*546Section 72 provides that “ where it appears by affidavit that * * * chattels have been or are about to be removed, secreted or transferred, without the consent of the vendor, lessor or…