Legal Opinion
S. Kriete Osborn v. Sinclair Refining Company
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided February 28, 1961No. 7899PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOBELOFF, Chief Judge.
Once again, as in McElhenney Co. v. Western Auto Supply Co., 4 Cir., 1959, 269 F.2d 332, this court is faced with a problem arising from a manufacturer’s refusal to continue selling to a dealer because of the latter’s failure to accede to the seller’s wishes with regard to products carried. This time the question arises in the context of the petroleum industry, and the particular issue is whether there existed between the Sinclair Refining Company and its customers an illegal tying arrangement prohibited by section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1. Northern Pac. R.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Paul Lessig v. Tidewater Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company v. American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Advance Business Systems and Supply Company v. Scm Corporation, Advance Business Systems and Supply Company v. Scm CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
- Hobart Brothers Company v. Malcolm T. Gilliland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Cornwell Quality Tools Co. v. C. T. S. Company, Inc., Cornwell Quality Tools Co. v. C. T. S. Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.