People v. Snell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Case held, decision reserved, and matter remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: On appeal from a conviction of reckless endanger*934ment in the first degree and assault in the second degree, defendant argues that reversal is required because he was not present at a Ventimiglia hearing (see, People v Ventimiglia, 52 NY2d 350) or at a Sandoval hearing (see, People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371). Defendant has the right to be present at a Ventimiglia hearing and violation of that right requires reversal even in the absence of timely objection…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. VentimigliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. DanielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. SnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994