Legal Opinion

People v. Snell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Case held, decision reserved, and matter remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: On appeal from a conviction of reckless endanger*934ment in the first degree and assault in the second degree, defendant argues that reversal is required because he was not present at a Ventimiglia hearing (see, People v Ventimiglia, 52 NY2d 350) or at a Sandoval hearing (see, People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371). Defendant has the right to be present at a Ventimiglia hearing and violation of that right requires reversal even in the absence of timely objection…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. VentimigliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. People v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. People v. DanielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. People v. SnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API