Legal Opinion

Forsythe's Estate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1923No. Appeal, 119PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

The purpose of the 17th section of the Act of 1917, P. L. 403, appears with reasonable clearness from the language employed. It provides a method of charging pecuniary legacies on any real estate of the decedent not specifically devised where there is a deficiency of personal assets applicable to the payment of such bequests. Resort was had to the statute for the purpose of securing the balance due the petitioners on their respective legacies under the will of Margaret Forsythe. The executor filed •an account in which the balance for distribution among legatees was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kellerman's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  2. Miller's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Cox v. RogersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
  4. Zimmerman v. LeboSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  5. Grothe's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bayard's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Moore's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Andreas EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Lehigh County · 1956
  4. Haftman EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Washington County · 1962
  5. Laughlin EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Allegheny County · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API