Legal Opinion
Archer v. Tudor Const. Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 15, 1995No. 94-850PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
649 So.2d 1251 (1995)
James ARCHER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TUDOR CONSTRUCTION CO., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 94-850.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
February 15, 1995.
Earl Arthur Maxwell, New Orleans, for James Archer.
Samuel Newman Poole, Jr., Alexandria, for Tudor Const. Co.
Before KNOLL, SAUNDERS and AMY, JJ.
KNOLL, Judge.
The sole issue on appeal is whether the Office of Worker's Compensation abused its discretion by dismissing the plaintiff's case with prejudice pursuant to LSA-C.C.P. Art. 1672(A) because the plaintiff failed to appear on the day set for trial. We affirm.
FACTS
The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Horton v. McCarySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Tranum v. HebertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Sauce v. BussellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Gallagher v. GallagherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
- Malter v. McKinneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jackson v. Royal Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- Meadows v. WinklerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Brooks v. Tradesmen International, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- Richardson v. O'NEALLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- Amy v. Schlumberger Technology Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.