Baldwin v. Rosenman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Assumpsit; brought to the Superior Court in Fairfield County, and tried to the court before Martin, J. Facts found and .judgment rendered for the defendant, and motion in error by the plaintiff. The case is fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.
The question in this case is, whether upon the facts found relating to the two deeds of compromise the plaintiff is entitled to recover. The first compromise agree*106ment was made in December, 1876, by which the plaintiff and all the other creditors of the defendant agreed to accept fifty per cent, of their respective claims. This agreement the court finds was entered into and signed by the plaintiff upon and in consideration of a further agreement by parol between himself and the defendant, made at that time, that the plaintiff and one Nichols, who was also a creditor, should endorse the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Doughty v. SavageSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859
- Huntington v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re ChaplinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1902
- Tinker v. HurstMichigan Supreme Court · 1888