T. W. Lind Co. v. Nu Fastner Co.
Superior Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
DORAN, J.
A new trial cannot be allowed for newly discovered evidence suggested by the affidavits filed. Such new evidence is mainly if not entirely cumulative. A letter now offered by defendant, not put in at the trial, stating that a note made by defendant was received by plaintiff in exchange for a pre-existing note, states no more than Mr. Lind said on the stand.
When the foreman was asked if the jury found for plaintiff or defendant, he answered “For the plaintiff, $1000, the amount of the note.” The verdict written by the clerk and signed by the foreman was in the ordinary form in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Spurr v. Inhabitants of ShelburneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Mair v. BassettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Seeman v. FeeneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Rockefeller v. WedgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
- Walker v. BaileySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1876