Legal Opinion

T. W. Lind Co. v. Nu Fastner Co.

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 8, 1919No. 40877Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

DORAN, J.

A new trial cannot be allowed for newly discovered evidence suggested by the affidavits filed. Such new evidence is mainly if not entirely cumulative. A letter now offered by defendant, not put in at the trial, stating that a note made by defendant was received by plaintiff in exchange for a pre-existing note, states no more than Mr. Lind said on the stand.

When the foreman was asked if the jury found for plaintiff or defendant, he answered “For the plaintiff, $1000, the amount of the note.” The verdict written by the clerk and signed by the foreman was in the ordinary form in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spurr v. Inhabitants of ShelburneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  2. Mair v. BassettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Seeman v. FeeneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
  4. Rockefeller v. WedgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
  5. Walker v. BaileySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API