Legal Opinion

Zseltvay v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 31, 1998No. 01A01-9710-CV-00587PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BEN H. CANTRELL, Judge.

The plaintiff claimed that Nashville’s Board of Parks and Recreation conducted its business in such a way as to violate the Open Meetings Act, Tenn.Code Ann. § 8-44-101, et seq. The trial court refused to discipline the Board, dismissing the complaint against it on a finding that the Board had committed a merely technical violation of the Act. We reverse, and direct the court to impose judicial oversight upon the Board, as is required by the Act, but we decline to comply with the plaintiffs request that we declare the Board’s action to be void and of no effect.

I

On…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Union Carbide Corp. v. HuddlestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Badgett v. RogersTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Neese v. Paris Special School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mayhew v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  2. Bob Fannon, Individually and as a City Councilman for the City of LaFollette v. City of LaFollotteTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Bob Fannon, Individually and as a City Councilman for the City of LaFollette v. City of LaFollotteTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Estate of W.O. McIntyreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  5. Grace Fellowhip Church v. Lenoir City Beer Bd. & KVAT Food Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API