Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Wilford J.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERLUSS, P. J.—
“A parent’s fundamental right to adequate notice and the opportunity to be heard in dependency matters involving potential deprivation of the parental interest [citation] has little, if any, value unless the parent is advised of the nature of the hearing giving rise to that opportunity, including what will be decided therein. Only with adequate advisement can one choose to appear or not, to prepare or not, and to defend or not. ” (In re Stacy T. (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 1415, 1424 [61 Cal.Rptr.2d 319], italics added.)
In accordance with the general practice followed by many…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re BGCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
3Cited by25 opinions
- In Re Sheena K.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Riverside County Department of Public Social Services v. A.B.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- In Re JhCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Jonathan G.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Robert A.California Court of Appeal · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.