Legal Opinion

White v. Bernhart

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1925PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

— This is an action to abate a private nuisance. As the facts upon which the injunction is sought the complaint alleges that Sixth Avenue South,' in Pocatello, is a street devoted exclusively to neatly kept residences, with the east front of all houses on the west side of the street located approximately 25 or 30 feet back from the sidewalk line; in block 266 respondent is the owner of Lots 1 and 2, the south half of Lot 5< and all of Lot 6, on the west side of the street, and had erected upon Lot 6 and the part of Lot 5 a six-room modern brick dwelling at a distance of 25 or 30 feet back…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crossman v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Hunter v. WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Sweet v. BallentyneIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
  4. John K. Cummings Realty & Investment Co. v. Deere & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. Meek v. De LatourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sundowner, Inc. v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  2. McVicars v. ChristensenIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Hungate v. Bonner CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Campbell v. HammockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  5. Green v. SchickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API