Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Wilson

Cuyahoga County Probate Court

Decided April 22, 1966No. 677800PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Chief Referee.

This is an action to construe the will of Florence M. McDonald. The action is brought by the executor of the will.

I am asked to construe Item II, which reads as follows:

“All of the residue and remainder of my property I give and devise in equal shares to Albert Wilson of Toronto, Canada, son of my late husband’s niece Jean Wilson; The Little Sisters of the Poor of Cleveland, Ohio and Our Lady of Peace Church of Cleveland, Ohio.”

The question presented is whether each of the three beneficiaries is entitled to one-third of the residue or whether Mr. Albert Wilson is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cassidy v. Vannatta's Ex'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  2. Reiss, Exr. v. PearsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kowalczyk v. ClementsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API