Legal Opinion

Miller Electric Co. v. DeWeese

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 2006No. 26 WAP 2004PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*169 OPINION

Justice EAKIN.

Appellant Birmingham Bistro, Inc. appeals from the order of the Superior Court quashing its appeal as untimely. We reverse.

Jush-Mark, Inc., the general contractor at a construction site owned by Tate DeWeese, hired appellee Miller Electric Company as a subcontractor to perform the electrical work. Miller received partial payment, but a balance of $14,871.53 existed at the time the project was finished. Miller filed a complaint against Just-Mark, Inc. to recover that balance; DeWeese was named as an additional defendant.

After unsuccessful attempts to serve DeWeese at his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Novy v. NovySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Eachus v. Chester County Tax Claim BureauCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Freidenbloom v. WeyantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Goldberg v. GoldbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. First Nat. Bank of Northeast v. GooslinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Levitt v. PatrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Generation Mortg. Co. v. Bung Thi NguyenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. In re Estate of BechtelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. D.L. Ness v. York Twp. Board of Commissioners and York County CommissionersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API