Legal Opinion

Barnett v. New York Central Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The duty of an engineer when crossing public highways in rural districts is to exercise ordinary and reasonable care, so far as the public are concerned, in view of the danger involved, to keep a lookout for such crossings *637to avoid collision with and injury to objects, vehicles and persons using them. (2 Thomp. Neg. § 1592; Morris v. Lake Shore & M. S. Railway Co., 148 N. Y. 182, 185; Doll v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 52 App. Div. 575; Doyle v. Penn. R. R. Co., 139 N. Y. 637; Harty v. Central R. R. Co: of N. J., 42 id. 468, 472; Chrystal v. Troy & Boston R. R. Co., 105 id. 164, 169; Spooner v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morris v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Doll v. Lehigh Valley RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Doyle v. . Pennsylvania and New York Canal and Rd. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Douglas Smith v. Lehigh Valley Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  2. Lee v. Pennsylvania RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API