Legal Opinion

People v. Hastings

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1866PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Sixth Judicial District, Sacramento County. The defendant recovered judgment and the plaintiff appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Rhodes, J.

Suit was brought for the recovery of delinquent taxes levied for the year 1863. The defendant had judgment and the plaintiffs appeal from the judgment and the order refusing a new trial. It appears from the pleadings that the taxes sued for were levied under the Act to incorporate the City of Sacramento, approved April 25th, 1863. (Stats. 1863, p. 415.) The assessment was made under the provisions of the following sections of that Act:

“ Section 63. For the purpose of enabling the city authorities to levy and collect the annual and special taxes for the fiscal year…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Estate of MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. McCreeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Clegg v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Pratt v. BreckinridgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  4. The People of N.C. Ex Rel . Van Bokkelen v. . CanadaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  5. People v. San Francisco Sav. UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API