Freeman v. State

BARNES, Presiding Judge.

Quentin Demond Freeman appeals his conviction for armed robbery, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress identification evidence, and in denying his motion for a directed verdict. Upon review, we affirm.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence. Hall v. State, 282 Ga. 294, 297 (3) (647 SE2d 585) (2007). We do not weigh the evidence or determine the credibility of witnesses, but only determine if the evidence is…