Legal Opinion

Brown v. Brown

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1977No. 12184PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal from a judgment of divorce, appellant claims that the trial court erred in denying her request that her maiden name be restored. We agree and remand to the trial court with directions that appellant’s maiden name be restored.

Under the common law, any adult or emancipated person could change his or her name at will, without any legal proceedings, simply by adopting another name, as long as he did not do so for a fraudulent or criminal purpose. See Piotrowski v. Piotrowski, 71 Mich.App. 213, 247 N.W.2d 354, 355 (1976); Kruzel v. Podell, 67 Wis.2d 138, 151, 226 N.W.2d 458, 464…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re HalliganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  2. Petition of HauptlyIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In Re Petition of KruzelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Custer v. BonadiesConnecticut Superior Court · 1974
  5. In Re Application of LawrenceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sneed v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. Traugott v. PetitSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  3. In Re Marriage of ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Torbit v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. In re PhillipsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API