Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Golconda Mining Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 27, 1971No. 65 Civil 1512PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
On October 30, 1969, a consent judgment was entered under which, among other matters, the defendants were enjoined from future violations of the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws. The action had been commenced by the Securities and Exchange Commission, based upon transactions engaged in by the defendants as corporate insiders in the securities of Hecla Mining Company and Lucky Friday Silver-Lead Mines Company, which the Commission charged were in violation of section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 1 and Commission Rule…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Diamond v. OreamunoNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Astor v. Texas Gulf Sulphur CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Manor Nursing Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,351 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Commonwealth Chemical Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,021 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Larry D. Blavin, D/B/A Providence Investment AdvisoryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Fletcher v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.