Legal Opinion

Holleman v. Halliburton Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 30, 1970No. 17083PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANGDON, Justice.

This appeal is from a summary judgment.

The Halliburton Company, appellee, initiated suit against B. J. Holleman on a promissory note and then filed a motion for summary judgment against appellant with attached affidavit and exhibits. Appellant filed sworn pleadings and opposing affidavit.

In its appeal from the summary judgment the appellant asserts that the court erred in failing to find that the following matters were raised as issues of fact: (1) lack of consideration; (2) waiver and estoppel to enforce the alleged note (a) as binding obligation of appellant, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Womack v. Allstate Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Howeth v. DavenportCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. Bill Jones v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  4. Mason v. Mid-Continent Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Smith v. Crockett Production Credit Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Garza v. Allied Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Texas Export Development Corporation v. SchlederCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Riverdrive Mall, Inc. v. Larwin Mortgage InvestorsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Rose v. Carney's Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API