Legal Opinion

Yuba Consolidated Gold Fields v. Kilkeary

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 5, 1952No. 6512PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEMMON; District Judge.

The plaintiff, k M-aine corporation, has filed in this Court a complaint “for relief against multiplicity of actions, for declaratory relief, for an injunction, and for other appropriate relief”.

In its opening memorandum, the plaintiff describes its complaint as being “in equity in the nature of a bill of peace”, seeking “to avoid a multiplicity of hundreds of legal actions by determining in one equity suit the liability asserted in all claims against Yuba (plaintiff) for damages resulting from floods on theYuba River in November and December, 1950”. The complaint…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
  2. Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. KaratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Hale v. AllinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Walker v. New Mexico & Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Yuba Consolidated Gold Fields v. KilkearyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API