Legal Opinion

Farwell v. Nilsson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1890PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court fop the First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Loein C. Collins, Judge, presiding.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Appellate Court fop the First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Loein C. Collins, Judge, presiding. The following is a sufficiently full and accurate statement of this case, prepared by the Appellate Court, and the opinion of that court thereon: “Appellants filed a creditor’s hill, in which, after alleging the recovery of a judgment against said appellee Nilsson, and the return of an execution issued thereon, no part satisfied, it is further alleged, that April 5, 1888, and for some time prior to that date, the defendant,…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The questions presented in this case have been thoroughly considered, both in this and kindred cases, and we are entirely satisfied with the correctness of the views of the Appellate Court, as expressed by Mr. Justice Moran in the foregoing opinion. Like ruling will be found in Weber v. Mick, 131 Ill. 520.

The judgment of the Appellate Court is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weber v. MickIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Tompkins v. . HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Warner v. LittlefieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Farwell v. CohenIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Morrison v. RiemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917
  5. United States v. GotwalsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API