Legal Opinion

Barnes v. RMS Protective Services

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided October 2, 2025No. 2:23-cv-00342Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION Ronald G. Barnes, et al., ) Individually and for others similarly ) Situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:23-cv-00342-MHH ) RMS Protective Services, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act concerns security guards who worked at Warrior Met Coal’s mines in Alabama during a strike. The plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and similarly situated security guards, allege that the defendants did not pay them overtime compensation that the FLSA requires.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Watts v. Florida International UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Stephen Grossman v. Nationsbank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  3. Financial SEC. Assur., Inc. v. Stephens, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Sacred Heart Health Systems, Inc. v. Humana Military Healthcare Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Abbott Labs., Inc. v. General Elec. CapitalDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API