Legal Opinion · Dissent

Surgicenters of America, Inc., an Arizona Corporation v. Medical Dental Surgeries, Co., an Oregon Corporation Dba Medical Dental Surgicenters

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 22, 1979No. 77-2490Published

1DissentGoodwin, Circuit Judge

Faced with a difficult question in a complex area of law, the district court stated but did not apply the proper test to determine whether a name is generic. Even if the proper test had been applied, defendant’s evidence was not sufficient to meet the heavy burden of proof it carried.

I

By statute, plaintiff’s certificate of registration is prima facie evidence of the mark’s validity. 15 U.S.C. § 1057(b). By case law, this means not only that the mark’s challenger has the burden of going forward, but also that registration carries with it a “strong presumption of validity”. Miss Universe, Inc.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Abercrombie & Fitch Company v. Hunting World, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  3. Miller Brewing Company v. G. Heileman Brewing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  4. Bayer Co. v. United Drug Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1921
  5. Blisscraft of Hollywood v. United Plastics Company, Marmax Products Corp., and Morris Shapiro, Doing Business as Great Eastern Housewares CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API