Legal Opinion

Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 17, 2022No. 21-50792PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Case: 21-50792 Document: 00516169171 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/17/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 17, 2022 No. 21-50792 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Whole Woman's Health, on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients; Alamo City Surgery Center, P.L.L.C., on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, doing business as Alamo Women's Reproductive Services; Brookside Women's Medical Center, P.A., on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, doing business as…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Lehman Brothers v. ScheinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Bellotti v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional De Marineros De HondurasSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mi Familia Vota v. OggCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
  2. Stanford v. Brandon NursingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025
  3. Texas Equal Access Fund v. Ashley Maxwell, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2024
  4. Whole Woman's Health v. Judge Austin Reeve Jackson Penny Clarkston Mark Lee Dickson Stephen Brint Carlton Katherine A. Thomas Cecile Erwin Young Allison Vordenbaumen Benz Ken PaxtonTexas Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Whole Woman's Health v. Judge Austin Reeve Jackson Penny Clarkston Mark Lee Dickson Stephen Brint Carlton Katherine A. Thomas Cecile Erwin Young Allison Vordenbaumen Benz Ken PaxtonTexas Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API