Legal Opinion

Application of David Neville Kirk and Vladimir Petrow

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 10, 1967No. Patent Appeal 7522Published

1Opinion of the Court

376 F.2d 936

Application of David Neville KIRK and Vladimir Petrow.

Patent Appeal No. 7522.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

March 16, 1967.

Dissenting Opinions April 10, 1967.

Bacon & Thomas, Washington, D. C. (Jesse B. Grove, Jr., Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellants.

Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D. C. (Jack E. Armore, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, RICH, SMITH, and ALMOND, Judges, and Judge WILLIAM H. KIRKPATRICK.*

WORLEY, Chief Judge.

1

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Brenner v. MansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Peak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Mason v. HepburnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1898

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API