Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Kane v. Hanley

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Peoceeding upon a writ of habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtLydon, J.

This is a habeas corpus proceeding, but it is sought to use the writ of habeas corpus for a very unusual purpose. In effect, the relator .is seeking to be released from a custody into which he has not as yet been placed. The relator is now in the custody of the warden of the city prison by virtue of a commitment issued by a magistrate, holding the relator for the Court of General Sessions upon a felonious charge. But the purpose of the relator is not to be discharged from that custody, and, as a matter of fact, bail has been fixed, and he can be discharged upon giving that bail. What the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. MaddenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Schlecter v. JenningsNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  2. People ex rel. Ackron v. HuntNew York Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API